Abstract
The ‘social provisioning process’ framework postulates that making provisioning processes more socially and
ecologically sustainable requires structural changes in terms of the material, social, and cultural bases of
economies. This paper explores the ways in which local community-led grassroots initiatives (GIs) contribute to
such structural changes. The purpose of this paper is twofold: First, we offer systematic empirical evidence on the
impact of GI activities on societal structures, which are crucial for assessing the transformative potential of GIs
but have been insufficiently addressed in the literature. Second, we adapt and further develop the ‘social provisioning
process’ framework to make it operational for research on local provisioning processes, thereby proposing
a strong heterodox economic theory – which accounts for the structural dimension – to the research field
of GIs that it was lacking so far. To this end, a qualitative multiple-case study design is employed to investigate
three GIs. Eight categories of provisioning structures are identified as an advancement of the ‘social provisioning
process’ framework. The data show how the three GI cases build a structural basis in each of the eight categories,
which tends to facilitate more sustainable provisioning, and reveal foci, strategies, and limitations in the creation
of those structures.
ecologically sustainable requires structural changes in terms of the material, social, and cultural bases of
economies. This paper explores the ways in which local community-led grassroots initiatives (GIs) contribute to
such structural changes. The purpose of this paper is twofold: First, we offer systematic empirical evidence on the
impact of GI activities on societal structures, which are crucial for assessing the transformative potential of GIs
but have been insufficiently addressed in the literature. Second, we adapt and further develop the ‘social provisioning
process’ framework to make it operational for research on local provisioning processes, thereby proposing
a strong heterodox economic theory – which accounts for the structural dimension – to the research field
of GIs that it was lacking so far. To this end, a qualitative multiple-case study design is employed to investigate
three GIs. Eight categories of provisioning structures are identified as an advancement of the ‘social provisioning
process’ framework. The data show how the three GI cases build a structural basis in each of the eight categories,
which tends to facilitate more sustainable provisioning, and reveal foci, strategies, and limitations in the creation
of those structures.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 108429 |
Fachzeitschrift | Ecological Economics |
Jahrgang | 227 |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1 Jan. 2025 |