Abstract
The study at hand analyzes the impact of the Covid‐19 pandemic and related restrictions on scholars in the area of media and communication studies. It aims to highlight inequalities in the negative effects of the pandemic on academic output by examining the working conditions of scholars, taking into account gender, parenthood, and the partnership‐based division of professional and care work. The quantitative survey was directed at communication scholars in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The findings show that there are no significant gender differences in terms of changes in academic output during the first 15 months of the pandemic; instead, disadvantages were observed in terms of parenting, regardless of the gender of the parents. Gender‐specific effects could be detected concerning family situations and partnerships. Here, male participants are more often found in relationships in which the partner only works half‐time, than women who mostly live with a partner who works full‐time. The data suggest that gender differences related to changes in the time allotted for professional and care work and academic output are leveled out by the characteristics of the academic career model in which German‐speaking scholars work. Nevertheless, gendered structures in academia and partnerships shape how the impact of the pandemic on professional work is experienced.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 184-196 |
Seitenumfang | 13 |
Fachzeitschrift | Media and Communication |
Jahrgang | 11 |
Ausgabenummer | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2023 |
Extern publiziert | Ja |
Bibliographische Notiz
Funding Information:Data collection and analysis were gratefully supported by grants from the Austrian Society for Communication Studies (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kommunikati-onswissenschaft [ÖGK]), the German Communication Association (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Publizistik‐ und Kommunikationswissenschaft [DGPuK]) as well as the University of Rostock. The authors would like to say a spe-cial thank you to Felicitas Ilge and Andreas Röser for their tremendous support in preparing the data. In additionsincere thanks are extended to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable revision comments.
Funding Information:
Data collection and analysis were gratefully supported by grants from the Austrian Society for Communication Studies (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kommunikati‐ onswissenschaft [ÖGK]), the German Communication Association (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Publizistik‐ und Kommunikationswissenschaft [DGPuK]) as well as the University of Rostock. The authors would like to say a spe‐ cial thank you to Felicitas Ilge and Andreas Röser for their tremendous support in preparing the data. In addition, sincere thanks are extended to the anonymous review‐ ers for their valuable revision comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the author(s);.