Abstract
While many authors have argued for the benefits of applying principles of modularization to ontologies, there is not yet a common understanding of how modules are defined and what properties they should have. In the previous section, this question was addressed from a purely logical point of view. In this chapter, we take a broader view on possible criteria that can be used to determine the quality of a modules. Such criteria include logic-based, but also structural and application-dependent criteria, sometimes borrowing from related fields such as software engineering. We give an overview of possible criteria and identify a lack of application-dependent quality measures. We further report some modularization experiments and discuss the role of quality criteria and evaluation in the context of these experiments.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Titel des Sammelwerks | Modular Ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5445 |
Herausgeber*innen | Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. |
Erscheinungsort | Berlin, Heidelberg |
Verlag | Springer |
Seiten | 67 - 89 |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2009 |
Österreichische Systematik der Wissenschaftszweige (ÖFOS)
- 102
- 102001 Artificial Intelligence
- 102015 Informationssysteme
- 102022 Softwareentwicklung