Abstract
A core aspect of diagrammatic process modeling is the visualization of the logical and temporal order in which tasks are to be performed in a process. While conventions and guidelines exist that promote modeling processes from left-to-right or from top-to-bottom, no empirically validated design rationale can be provided for this choice so far. Therefore, this paper seeks to determine whether some flow directions are better than others from a cognitive point of view. We present the results of a controlled pilot experiment comparing the effects of four flow directions (left-to-right, right-to-left, top-to-bottom, bottom-to-top) on process model comprehension with a small sample size of 44 participants. Although there is a variety of theoretical arguments which support the use of a left-to-right flow direction as convention for process models, the preliminary empirical results of the pilot experiment were less clear-cut and showed that model readers also adapted well to uncommon reading directions.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Titel des Sammelwerks | International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA) |
Herausgeber*innen | Jens Kolb, Henrik Leopold, Jan Mendling |
Erscheinungsort | Innsbruck, Austria |
Verlag | Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn |
Seiten | 59 - 73 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-88579-642-8 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2015 |
Österreichische Systematik der Wissenschaftszweige (ÖFOS)
- 102006 Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
- 102015 Informationssysteme
- 102013 Human-Computer Interaction
- 102024 Usability Research
- 502050 Wirtschaftsinformatik
- 501011 Kognitionspsychologie
- 503008 E-Learning