Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation einer Magnetresonanzbildgebung vor Biopsie zur Diagnose von Prostatakarzinomen [Health-economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer]. [Epub ahead of print].

Andreas Stadlbauer, R. Bernt, Erich Salomonowitz, E. Plas, Guido Strunk, K. Eberhardt

    Publikation: Wissenschaftliche FachzeitschriftOriginalbeitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungBegutachtung

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was the health-economic analysis of MR imaging in the diagnostics of suspicious prostate carcinoma (PCa) before execution of a first biopsy.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS: The health-economic analysis included four steps: modeling, determination of probabilities, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses. We performed an effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective as well as a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis from the health insurance perspective for Austria and Germany. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis used a hypothetical cohort of 100 000 patients. The result parameters were number of biopsies, number of detected PCa, and monetary costs. For the cost-efficiency analysis, the result parameters, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs, were calculated for an individual patient.
    RESULTS: The efficiency analysis showed that MRI before a first biopsy can prevent ca. 64 000 unnecessary biopsies/ 100 000 patients. The diagnostic efficiency was higher by a factor of 1.7. Due to MRI, eight PCas were additionally detected. From a health insurance perspective, MRI was not cost-effective. Extra costs of ca. 42 m. EURO per 100 000 patients and of 650 EURO per prevented biopsy were calculated. The costs per detected PCa were increased by 1395 EURO. The attainable QALYs were a little higher for the MRI alternative, which was therefore not dominated.
    CONCLUSION: Our results do not permit a clear recommendation for or against the application of MRI in the diagnostics of PCa. From the patient perspective, it is to be endorsed due to the higher medical efficiency. However, it is connected with higher health insurance costs.
    OriginalspracheDeutsch (Österreich)
    FachzeitschriftRöFo
    PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Aug. 2011

    Zitat