TY - JOUR
T1 - Inequality Aversion and Voting on Redistribution
AU - Höchtl, W.
AU - Sausgruber, Rupert
AU - Tyran, J.-R.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of income classes. We experimentally study voting on redistribution between two income classes and show that the effect of inequality aversion is asymmetric. Inequality aversion is more likely to matter if the “rich” are in majority. With a “poor” majority, we find that redistribution outcomes look as if all voters were exclusively motivated by self-interest.
AB - Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of income classes. We experimentally study voting on redistribution between two income classes and show that the effect of inequality aversion is asymmetric. Inequality aversion is more likely to matter if the “rich” are in majority. With a “poor” majority, we find that redistribution outcomes look as if all voters were exclusively motivated by self-interest.
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292112000979
U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0014-2921
SP - 1406
EP - 1421
JO - European Economic Review
JF - European Economic Review
IS - 56
ER -