TY - GEN
T1 - Pricing Institutional Distance
T2 - Project Finance in Different Institutional Environments
AU - Müllner, Jakob
AU - Dorobantu, Sinziana
AU - Salomon, Robert
PY - 2018/7/9
Y1 - 2018/7/9
N2 - Research demonstrates that differences in institutions are at the core of the liability of foreignness. Scholars typically conceptualize and measure those differences as an ‘institutional distance’ between countries on cultural, political, and economic dimensions; and studies now show that institutional distance increases risks for firms operating in global markets. Although we have learned a great deal from studies that explicate the strategic and performance risks associated with institutional distance, we understand less than we should about how institutional distance translates into financial risks, and how to express those risks in a financially meaningful way. In this study, we fill that gap by examining how companies (i.e., banks) price institutional distance risks in a sample of 5,649 project finance deals from 2000-2012. Consistent with the underlying theory, we find that banks systematically vary the interest rates that they charge on large-scale project finance loans to account for cultural, political, and economic distance. We describe how managers of (non-financial) multinational corporations might use these findings to help insulate themselves from institutional risks.
AB - Research demonstrates that differences in institutions are at the core of the liability of foreignness. Scholars typically conceptualize and measure those differences as an ‘institutional distance’ between countries on cultural, political, and economic dimensions; and studies now show that institutional distance increases risks for firms operating in global markets. Although we have learned a great deal from studies that explicate the strategic and performance risks associated with institutional distance, we understand less than we should about how institutional distance translates into financial risks, and how to express those risks in a financially meaningful way. In this study, we fill that gap by examining how companies (i.e., banks) price institutional distance risks in a sample of 5,649 project finance deals from 2000-2012. Consistent with the underlying theory, we find that banks systematically vary the interest rates that they charge on large-scale project finance loans to account for cultural, political, and economic distance. We describe how managers of (non-financial) multinational corporations might use these findings to help insulate themselves from institutional risks.
U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.17846abstract
DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.17846abstract
M3 - Contribution to conference proceedings
T3 - Academy of Management Proceedings
BT - Academy of Management Proceedings
A2 - Taneja, Sonia
PB - Academy of Management
CY - New York
ER -