Abstract
The concept of socioemotional wealth (SEW) seeks to present an independent paradigmatic basis for family-firm research, and in doing so aims to establish a sound basis for the scientific legitimacy of family-firm research. Establishing that legitimacy requires scholars to demonstrate that SEW is based on coherent assumptions on several theoretical levels. This paper uses the problematization methodology to challenge the coherence of the theoretical assumptions underpinning SEW and to advance theory development. The results of this problematization show that SEW is built on a theoretical level close to the object of research (in-house assumptions), but that more deeply-rooted theoretical levels (e.g. paradigmatic assumptions) are not sufficiently elaborated. Moreover, the original conceptualization is based on a positivist-mechanistic view, which hinders SEW reflecting the complex reality of family firms. Based on the results of this problematization, new systems theory is applied to reframe SEW’s theoretical grounding. Thereby the main contribution of the paper is a critical reflection on the theoretical underpinnings of SEW (in particular root-metaphor and paradigmatic assumptions), serving as the basis for advancing a coherent theoretical understanding of this important concept in family business research.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 199 - 223 |
Fachzeitschrift | Entrepreneurship & Regional Development |
Jahrgang | 30 |
Ausgabenummer | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2018 |
Österreichische Systematik der Wissenschaftszweige (ÖFOS)
- 502052 Betriebswirtschaftslehre
- 502016 KMU-Forschung
- 506009 Organisationstheorie
- 502044 Unternehmensführung
- 502014 Innovationsforschung
- 502026 Personalmanagement
- 502043 Unternehmensberatung
- 502006 Controlling