Abstract
We analyse the welfare effect of governmental regulation for individuals who consider anticipated regret in their decision-making process. Although governmental policies by directing choice, distort individual decisions in the private market, they can alleviate individuals' pain associated with the feeling of regret. We analyse this trade-off and provide conditions under which the implied reduction of regret justifies regulation. Furthermore, we demonstrate our findings on tax deduction for non-insured losses, a well-studied social policy in insurance. Last, we consider heterogenous individuals and alternative social welfare functions and show that our results hold in these extended settings. © 2014 The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 65 - 89 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Geneva Risk and Insurance Review (former: Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory) |
| Volume | 39 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2014 |
Zitat
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver