Abstract
Academic writing on the prohibition of "forced or compulsory labour" according to Article 4(2) ECHR is scarce; a fact which may well indicate that this provision does not pose major prob-lems, scholarly as well as practically. Such an assessment, this is obvious, would prove to be quite naïve. A closer look at the provision, moreover, reveals a quite singular structure in need of further analysis. To undertake this in the light of the case law the subject has generated is the object of the following article which concludes that the common understanding of Article 4(2) and (3) ECHR in academia is based on a misconception.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 263 - 271 |
Fachzeitschrift | European human rights law review |
Ausgabenummer | 2 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1 Juni 2014 |
Österreichische Systematik der Wissenschaftszweige (ÖFOS)
- 505011 Menschenrechte