TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching Constructive Replications in the Behavioral and Social Sciences Using Quantitative Data
AU - Bauer, Gerrit
AU - Breznau, Nate
AU - Gereke, Johanna
AU - Höffler, Jan H.
AU - Janz, Nicole
AU - Rahal, Rima Maria
AU - Rennstich, Joachim K.
AU - Soiné, Hannah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Introduction: The replication crisis in the behavioral and social sciences spawned a credibility revolution, calling for new open science research practices that ensure greater transparency, including preregistrations, open data and code, and open access. Statement of the Problem: Replications of published research are an important element in this revolution as part of the self-correcting process of scientific knowledge production; however, the teaching value of replications is still underutilized thus far. Literature Review: Pedagogical knowledge points to the value of replication as critical to the scientific method of test and retest. Psychology has already begun mass efforts to reproduce previous experiments. Yet, we have very few examples of how analytical and reanalysis replications, after the data come in, contribute to the reproducibility crisis and can be integrated into undergraduate and graduate courses. Teaching Implications: Replications with quantitative data can be a pedagogical tool for improving student research method skills and introducing them to best research practices via learning-by-doing. Conclusion: This article aims to start filling this gap by offering guidance to instructors in designing and teaching replications for students at various levels and disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences, including a supplementary teaching companion.
AB - Introduction: The replication crisis in the behavioral and social sciences spawned a credibility revolution, calling for new open science research practices that ensure greater transparency, including preregistrations, open data and code, and open access. Statement of the Problem: Replications of published research are an important element in this revolution as part of the self-correcting process of scientific knowledge production; however, the teaching value of replications is still underutilized thus far. Literature Review: Pedagogical knowledge points to the value of replication as critical to the scientific method of test and retest. Psychology has already begun mass efforts to reproduce previous experiments. Yet, we have very few examples of how analytical and reanalysis replications, after the data come in, contribute to the reproducibility crisis and can be integrated into undergraduate and graduate courses. Teaching Implications: Replications with quantitative data can be a pedagogical tool for improving student research method skills and introducing them to best research practices via learning-by-doing. Conclusion: This article aims to start filling this gap by offering guidance to instructors in designing and teaching replications for students at various levels and disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences, including a supplementary teaching companion.
KW - analytical replication
KW - computational reproduction
KW - open science
KW - quantitative data
KW - teaching replication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180237636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00986283231219503
DO - 10.1177/00986283231219503
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85180237636
SN - 0098-6283
VL - 52
SP - 117
EP - 123
JO - Teaching of Psychology
JF - Teaching of Psychology
IS - 1
ER -