The Governance of Public–Nonprofit Service Networks: A Comparison Between Three Types of Governance Roles

Peter Raeymaeckers, Caroline Vermeiren, Charlotte Noel, Stijn Van Puyvelde, Jurgen Willems

Publikation: Wissenschaftliche FachzeitschriftOriginalbeitrag in FachzeitschriftBegutachtung

Abstract

In this research, we focus on the governance role of the coordinator affiliated to the leading agency in public–nonprofit service networks. We analyze the extent to which different types of coordinators are able to build consensus on a set of network goals in close collaboration with the nonprofit network partners. We explore three network cases, respectively, coordinated by a commissioner, a co-producer and a facilitator. Both network coordinators and respondents from participating nonprofit service agencies are interviewed. In contrast to earlier studies our analysis indicates that, in comparison with a facilitator, a commissioner and a co-producer are better equipped to reach consensus on a set of goals in service networks. The practice of synthesis is considered as very important when establishing consensus in a network.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1037 - 1048
FachzeitschriftVoluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Jahrgang31
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020

Österreichische Systematik der Wissenschaftszweige (ÖFOS)

  • 505027 Verwaltungslehre
  • 211903 Betriebswissenschaften
  • 502023 NPO-Forschung
  • 605005 Publikumsforschung

Schlagwörter

  • Governance roles
  • Network coordinator
  • Network governance
  • Poverty
  • Public¿nonprofit
  • Qualitative research
  • public

Zitat