Same same but different? Administrative Roles and Politicization in Ministerial Bureaucracies.

  • Falk Ebinger (Contributor)
  • Sylvia Veit (Contributor)

Activity: Talk or presentationScience to science

Description

This paper investigates variances in role perceptions and functional politicization of senior civil servants (SCS) dependent on their actual working tasks. Three types of SCS in government departmentswith a different task focusare distinguished: strategists, policy specialists, and administrators.The empirical basis of the paper is a survey study on SCS conducted at federal level in Germany in 2017. Data cover a full inventory of the four highest hierarchical ranks in federal ministries (N=607).Role perceptions are measured by asking the SCS in how far they agree with ten different role models first developed in the Comparative Elite Studies from the 1970ies and 1980ies (Aberbach, Rockman, & Putnam, 1981; Derlien, 2003; Mayntz & Derlien, 1989). We differentiate these role models in active and reactive role models. Functional politicization is measured through an index first developed by Schwanke and Ebinger(2006)based on three different survey questions. The analyses reveal a mixed picture with regard to role perceptions. While there are striking similarities between the three groups with regard to some role images (e.g., thewide rejection of the role image as agent for specific organized interestsand the broad identification with the role image as an expert with specific problem-solving capacities), there are remarkable differences concerning some others. In particular, the legalist roleis considerably more widespread and the self-perception as an advocate of broader societal interests, as implementer of political goalsand as initiator of new projects and problem solutionsareless widespread among administratorsthan in the two other groups. Summing up the different role models in two indices (reactive role models,active role models), our analyses reveal that with regard to reactive role models, the group differences are small and not significant. The identification with
Period4 Sept 20197 Sept 2019
Event titleEuropean Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference
Event typeUnknown
Degree of RecognitionInternational

Austrian Classification of Fields of Science and Technology (ÖFOS)

  • 506009 Organisation theory
  • 506014 Comparative politics
  • 509004 Evaluation research
  • 502024 Public economy