TY - JOUR
T1 - A reply to Levrel and Martinet
AU - Spash, Clive L.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Levrel and Martinet (2020; hereafter LM) confuse two separate issues: classification relating to actual groups (their beliefs, motives and ideology) and the implications of a groups' (often paradigmatic) commitments including the implications for ontology, epistemology and methodology. The first concerns the existence of specific identifiable groups, which LM seem to accept even in terms of the validity of the classifications NRE/NEP/SEE. The second concerns how those groups' ideas fit with ideas relating to ecological, as opposed to any other, economics, and including incommensurability and incompatibility between theories, ideas and paradigms.
AB - Levrel and Martinet (2020; hereafter LM) confuse two separate issues: classification relating to actual groups (their beliefs, motives and ideology) and the implications of a groups' (often paradigmatic) commitments including the implications for ontology, epistemology and methodology. The first concerns the existence of specific identifiable groups, which LM seem to accept even in terms of the validity of the classifications NRE/NEP/SEE. The second concerns how those groups' ideas fit with ideas relating to ecological, as opposed to any other, economics, and including incommensurability and incompatibility between theories, ideas and paradigms.
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800920307813?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106695
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106695
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 179
SP - 1
EP - 2
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
IS - Jan
ER -