TY - JOUR
T1 - Are corporatist labour markets different? Labour market regimes and unemployment in OECD countries
AU - Sturn, Simon
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Empirical studies on the unemployment effects of labour market institutions show contradictory results. One explanation is that these institutions affect unemployment differently depending on the regime in which they operate. Because of good labour relations, institutional complementarities and a trade-off between external and internal flexibility, they produce distinctive effects in corporatist regimes. Based on empirical evidence from 20 OECD countries over the period 19852008, the author finds that, in corporatist labour markets, strict employment protection legislation reduces unemployment, and unemployment benefits have no negative effect. He also shows that high real interest rates, low capital accumulation and restrictive fiscal policy during recessions increase unemployment.
AB - Empirical studies on the unemployment effects of labour market institutions show contradictory results. One explanation is that these institutions affect unemployment differently depending on the regime in which they operate. Because of good labour relations, institutional complementarities and a trade-off between external and internal flexibility, they produce distinctive effects in corporatist regimes. Based on empirical evidence from 20 OECD countries over the period 19852008, the author finds that, in corporatist labour markets, strict employment protection legislation reduces unemployment, and unemployment benefits have no negative effect. He also shows that high real interest rates, low capital accumulation and restrictive fiscal policy during recessions increase unemployment.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2013.00179.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2013.00179.x
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0020-7780
VL - 152
SP - 237
EP - 254
JO - International Labour Review
JF - International Labour Review
IS - 2
ER -