Economic Imaginaries, Economics Theories and the Role of Economic Journalism

Hendrik Theine*

*Corresponding author for this work

Publication: Chapter in book/Conference proceedingChapter in edited volume

Abstract

Economic and social reality is complex, multifaceted and ambiguous. In order to make sense of this reality and act within it, economic actors are dependent on simplified understandings of the lived, day-to-day economic reality. These “economic imaginaries” function as key, but simplified, understandings of economic reality. They are legitimised and supported by powerful ideas and theories about the economy and economic relations originating in the scientific field of economics. It is important to understand that many “common-sense” ideas about economic realities were conceived and developed in this manner. Within academic economics, various schools of thought exist that conceptualise the economy in very distinct terms - some of the most influential ones will be reviewed in this chapter. Neoclassical and market-liberal thinking is one of the most dominant streams within academic economics. These ideas heavily influence what is termed “neoliberalism” - the dominant economic imaginary. This development of economic imaginaries takes place through three key channels: (1) academic economists’ active engagement as commentators and interpreters of economic relations, (2) various economic actors drawing on selected economic theory to advance their preferred understanding of economic relations, and (3) economics textbooks that shape young students’ minds much beyond narrow economics.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHow to Read Economic News
Subtitle of host publicationA Critical Approach to Economic Journalism
EditorsHenry Silke, Fergal Quinn, Maria Rieder
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages27-51
Number of pages25
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781000881004
ISBN (Print)9780367724269
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 selection and editorial matter, Henry Silke, Fergal Quinn and Maria Rieder; individual chapters, the contributors.

Cite this