TY - GEN
T1 - Eurasian Rail Freight in the One Belt One Road Era
AU - Schramm, Hans-Joachim
AU - Zhang, Sabrina
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Purpose
This paper presents an overview of the recent development of Eurasian rail freight in the One Belt, One Road Era and further evaluates its service quality in terms of transit times and transport costs compared to other transport modes in containerised supply chains between Europe and China.
Design/methodology/approach
A trade-off model of transit time and transport costs based on quantitative data from primary as well as secondary sources is developed to demonstrate the market niche for Eurasian rail freight vis-a-vis the more established modes of transport of sea, air, and sea/air. In a scenario analysis, further goods attributes influencing modal choice are employed to show for which cargo type Eurasian rail freight service is favourable.
Findings
At present, Eurasian rail freight is about 80% less expensive than air freight with only half of the transit time of conventional sea freight. Our scenario analysis further suggests that for shipping time sensitive goods with value ranging from 1.23 USD/kg to 10.89 USD/kg as well as goods with lower time sensitivity and value in a range of 2.46 USD/kg to 21.78 USD/kg, total logistics costs of Eurasian rail freight service beat all other modes of transport.
Research limitations/implications (if applicable)
We focused solemnly on containerized block train services offered by major rail transport operators and looked on service quality only in terms of transit times and transport costs.
Practical implications (if applicable)
Nowadays, Eurasian rail freight seems to be an option beneficial in terms of transport cost, transit time, reliability and service availability, which enables shippers to build up agile and sustainable supply chains between China and Europe.
Original/value
Our study firstly provides a comprehensive assessment of present Eurasian rail freight.
AB - Purpose
This paper presents an overview of the recent development of Eurasian rail freight in the One Belt, One Road Era and further evaluates its service quality in terms of transit times and transport costs compared to other transport modes in containerised supply chains between Europe and China.
Design/methodology/approach
A trade-off model of transit time and transport costs based on quantitative data from primary as well as secondary sources is developed to demonstrate the market niche for Eurasian rail freight vis-a-vis the more established modes of transport of sea, air, and sea/air. In a scenario analysis, further goods attributes influencing modal choice are employed to show for which cargo type Eurasian rail freight service is favourable.
Findings
At present, Eurasian rail freight is about 80% less expensive than air freight with only half of the transit time of conventional sea freight. Our scenario analysis further suggests that for shipping time sensitive goods with value ranging from 1.23 USD/kg to 10.89 USD/kg as well as goods with lower time sensitivity and value in a range of 2.46 USD/kg to 21.78 USD/kg, total logistics costs of Eurasian rail freight service beat all other modes of transport.
Research limitations/implications (if applicable)
We focused solemnly on containerized block train services offered by major rail transport operators and looked on service quality only in terms of transit times and transport costs.
Practical implications (if applicable)
Nowadays, Eurasian rail freight seems to be an option beneficial in terms of transport cost, transit time, reliability and service availability, which enables shippers to build up agile and sustainable supply chains between China and Europe.
Original/value
Our study firstly provides a comprehensive assessment of present Eurasian rail freight.
UR - http://www.nofoma.net
M3 - Contribution to conference proceedings
SN - 9788791070938
SP - 769
EP - 798
BT - 30th Annual NOFOMA Conference - Relevant Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research
A2 - Stentoft, Jan, null
PB - Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management, University of Southern Denmark
CY - Kolding
ER -