Abstract
The analysis of court decisions and associated events is part of the daily life of many legal practitioners. Unfortunately, since court decision texts can often be long and complex, bringing all events relating to a case in order, to understand their connections and durations is a time-consuming task. Automated court decision timeline generation could provide a visual overview of what happened throughout a case by representing the main legal events, together with relevant temporal information. Tools and technologies to extract events from court decisions however are still underdeveloped. To this end, in the current paper we compare the effectiveness of three different extraction mechanisms, namely deep learning, conditional random fields, and rule-based method, to facilitate automated extraction of events and their components (i.e., the event type, who was involved, and when it happened). In addition, we provide a corpus of manually annotated decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, which shall serve as a gold standard not only for our own evaluation, but also for the research community for comparison and further experiments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Legal Knowledge and Information Systems |
| Editors | Serena Villata, Jakub Harašta, Petr Křemen |
| Place of Publication | Online Event |
| Pages | 33 - 42 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Austrian Classification of Fields of Science and Technology (ÖFOS)
- 102
- 102001 Artificial intelligence
- 102015 Information systems
- 502050 Business informatics
- 505002 Data protection