Should we use single items? Better not

Marko Sarstedt; Adamantios Diamantopoulos; Thomas Salzberger

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040

Should we use single items? Better not

Marko Sarstedt
, Adamantios Diamantopoulos
, Thomas Salzberger

Institute for Statistics and Mathematics

Publication: Scientific journal › Journal article › peer-review

Abstract

Bergvist (2016, this issue) and Rossiter (2016, unpublished) claim that the conclusions of Sarstedt, Diamantopoulos, Salzberger, and Baumgartner (2016) are unwarranted as the study's methodology is flawed. This paper begs to differ.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3199 - 3203
Journal	Journal of Business Research
Volume	69
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040
Publication status	Published - 2016

Austrian Classification of Fields of Science and Technology (ÖFOS)

502020 Market research

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{b21eb8c39ad647cd9ca32decd1eda436,

title = "Should we use single items? Better not",

abstract = "Bergvist (2016, this issue) and Rossiter (2016, unpublished) claim that the conclusions of Sarstedt, Diamantopoulos, Salzberger, and Baumgartner (2016) are unwarranted as the study's methodology is flawed. This paper begs to differ.",

author = "Marko Sarstedt and Adamantios Diamantopoulos and Thomas Salzberger",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

pages = "3199 -- 3203",

journal = "Journal of Business Research",

issn = "0148-2963",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should we use single items? Better not

AU - Sarstedt, Marko

AU - Diamantopoulos, Adamantios

AU - Salzberger, Thomas

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Bergvist (2016, this issue) and Rossiter (2016, unpublished) claim that the conclusions of Sarstedt, Diamantopoulos, Salzberger, and Baumgartner (2016) are unwarranted as the study's methodology is flawed. This paper begs to differ.

AB - Bergvist (2016, this issue) and Rossiter (2016, unpublished) claim that the conclusions of Sarstedt, Diamantopoulos, Salzberger, and Baumgartner (2016) are unwarranted as the study's methodology is flawed. This paper begs to differ.

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014829631630090X

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0148-2963

VL - 69

SP - 3199

EP - 3203

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

IS - 8

ER -

Should we use single items? Better not

Abstract

Austrian Classification of Fields of Science and Technology (ÖFOS)

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this