Abstract
Has the global financial crisis of 2007ff had a visible impact on the economics profession? To answer this question we employ a bibliometric approach and compare the content and orientation of economic literature before and after the crisis with reference to two different samples: A large-scale sample consisting of more than 440,000 articles published between 1956 and 2016 and a smaller sample of 400 top-cited papers before and after the crisis. Our results suggest that
– unlike the Great Depression of the 1930s – the current financial crisis did not
lead to any major theoretical or methodological changes in contemporary economics, although the topic of financial instability received increased attention after the crisis.
– unlike the Great Depression of the 1930s – the current financial crisis did not
lead to any major theoretical or methodological changes in contemporary economics, although the topic of financial instability received increased attention after the crisis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Publication series
| Series | INET Oxford Working Paper Series |
|---|---|
| Number | 75 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver